[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4293742-06ba-8720-e2eb-d4d3bc4da044@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:08:10 +0800
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
To: "Flint.Wang" <hmsjwzb@...o.com>
Cc: stringbox8@...o.com, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs:remove redundant index_rbio_pages in
raid56_rmw_stripe
On 2022/9/29 09:44, Flint.Wang wrote:
> The index_rbio_pages in raid56_rmw_stripe is redundant.
index_rbio_pages() is to populate the rbio->bio_sectors array.
In raid56_rmw_stripe() we later calls sector_in_rbio(), which will check
if a sector is belonging to bio_lists.
If not called, all sector will be returned using the sectors in
rbio->bio_sectors, not using the sectors in bio lists.
Have you tried your patch with fstests runs?
IMHO it should fail a lot of very basic writes in RAID56.
Thanks,
Qu
> It is invoked in finish_rmw anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Flint.Wang <hmsjwzb@...o.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
> index f6395e8288d69..44266b2c5b86e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
> @@ -1546,8 +1546,6 @@ static int raid56_rmw_stripe(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
> if (ret)
> goto cleanup;
>
> - index_rbio_pages(rbio);
> -
> atomic_set(&rbio->error, 0);
> /* Build a list of bios to read all the missing data sectors. */
> for (total_sector_nr = 0; total_sector_nr < nr_data_sectors;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists