linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Rewrite the top-level index.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87czbegets.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:28:47 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Rewrite the top-level index.rst

[Sending a copy to the linux-next folks as well in the hope that it
helps when the conflict shows up there.]

Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> writes:

> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 09:34:18AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>>> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> writes:
>>> 
>>> > The top-level index.rst file is the entry point for the kernel's
>>> > documentation, especially for readers of the HTML output.  It is currently
>>> > a mess containing everything we thought to throw in there.  Firefox says it
>>> > would require 26 pages of paper to print it.  That is not a user-friendly
>>> > introduction.
>>> >
>>> > This series aims to improve our documentation entry point with a focus on
>>> > rewriting index.rst.  The result is, IMO, simpler and more approachable.
>>> > For anybody who wants to see the rendered results without building the
>>> > docs, have a look at:
>>> >
>>> >   https://static.lwn.net/kerneldoc/
>>> 
>>> So I think I'll go ahead and drop this into docs-next shortly.  Thanks
>>> to everybody who has commented.
>>> 
>>> This, of course, has the potential to create conflicts with other 6.1
>>> work that touches Documentation/index.rst.  Amazingly, as far as I can
>>> tell, there is only one linux-next commit touching that file - the
>>> addition of the Rust docs.  We'll want to be sure that doesn't get lost
>>> during the merge window.  I'll be sure to include a suitable heads-up in
>>> my pull request.
>>
>> I can add a note in my PR of Rust too -- how should I suggest it be
>> resolved?
>
> The Rust documentation change to Documentation/index.rst is simple
> enough:
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/index.rst b/Documentation/index.rst
>> index 4737c18c97ff..00722aa20cd7 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/index.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/index.rst
>> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ merged much easier.
>>     maintainer/index
>>     fault-injection/index
>>     livepatch/index
>> +   rust/index
>
> The resolution should take the docs-next version of the file, but add
> that line after "livepatch/index" in its new location.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon