[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <651530a9-2dc1-c781-a1b5-1e712684f94d@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 14:36:34 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, namit@...are.com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm/tlb: fix error word 'clleared' to 'cleared'
Hi--
I would say let's fix the sentence grammar, but I don't know
what "cleared set" means.
On 9/29/22 02:10, Xin Hao wrote:
> Just correct the wrong word 'clleared' to 'cleared'
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> index cda3118f3b27..c80a15ef0cbc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ static inline bool pte_flags_need_flush(unsigned long oldflags,
> diff &= ~_PAGE_ACCESSED;
>
> /*
> - * Did any of the 'flush_on_clear' flags was clleared set from between
> + * Did any of the 'flush_on_clear' flags was cleared set from between
It should be more like:
* Were any of the 'flush_on_clear' flags changed between
X86 people, does that make sense to you?
> * 'oldflags' and 'newflags'?
> */
> if (diff & oldflags & flush_on_clear)
> --
> 2.31.0
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists