[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220929225635.339549783@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 18:55:45 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 03/15] ring-buffer: Have the shortest_full queue be the shortest not longest
From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
The logic to know when the shortest waiters on the ring buffer should be
woken up or not has uses a less than instead of a greater than compare,
which causes the shortest_full to actually be the longest.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220927231823.718039222@goodmis.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Fixes: 2c2b0a78b3739 ("ring-buffer: Add percentage of ring buffer full to wake up reader")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index 6b145d48dfd1..02db92c9eb1b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, int full)
nr_pages = cpu_buffer->nr_pages;
dirty = ring_buffer_nr_dirty_pages(buffer, cpu);
if (!cpu_buffer->shortest_full ||
- cpu_buffer->shortest_full < full)
+ cpu_buffer->shortest_full > full)
cpu_buffer->shortest_full = full;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
if (!pagebusy &&
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists