[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32c9fcf2-e1b4-8d31-a1f4-b07b1d5c1dc5@zoho.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 01:14:11 -0400
From: hmsjwzb <hmsjwzb@...o.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Cc: stringbox8@...o.com, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs:remove redundant index_rbio_pages in
raid56_rmw_stripe
Hi Qu,
I test this patch with fstests runs ?
Four btrfs cases failed.
btrfs/219 btrfs/249 btrfs/253 btrfs/254
Thanks,
Flint
On 9/28/22 23:08, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/9/29 09:44, Flint.Wang wrote:
>> The index_rbio_pages in raid56_rmw_stripe is redundant.
>
> index_rbio_pages() is to populate the rbio->bio_sectors array.
>
> In raid56_rmw_stripe() we later calls sector_in_rbio(), which will check if a sector is belonging to bio_lists.
>
> If not called, all sector will be returned using the sectors in rbio->bio_sectors, not using the sectors in bio lists.
>
> Have you tried your patch with fstests runs?
>
> IMHO it should fail a lot of very basic writes in RAID56.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>> It is invoked in finish_rmw anyway.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Flint.Wang <hmsjwzb@...o.com>
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
>> index f6395e8288d69..44266b2c5b86e 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c
>> @@ -1546,8 +1546,6 @@ static int raid56_rmw_stripe(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio)
>> if (ret)
>> goto cleanup;
>> - index_rbio_pages(rbio);
>> -
>> atomic_set(&rbio->error, 0);
>> /* Build a list of bios to read all the missing data sectors. */
>> for (total_sector_nr = 0; total_sector_nr < nr_data_sectors;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists