linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: thermal: add loongson2k thermal binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <06fa0bd2-c447-d705-01be-791207a4be8a@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:04:41 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     zhanghongchen <zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn>,
        Liu Peibao <liupeibao@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: thermal: add loongson2k thermal
 binding

On 29/09/2022 10:23, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2022/9/29 下午3:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>> On 29/09/2022 09:07, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... and please test your patches before sending :(
>>>>> You said is refer that "reg: [[0, 534779136], [0, 48]] is too long" ?
>>>>> Need fix that warning, right?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. You said you tested it but then sent with an error... so it's not
>>>> really a testing.
>>> sorry, I did do some testing. but I think It is okay that can generate a
>>> dtb  without reporting an error when compile yaml file, in fact, I
>>> ignore the warning,  I will fix it in v6.
>>
>>
>> Do you also send the code with warnings reported by GCC? Judging by
>> number of kernel test robot reports, it could be. So just to be very,
>> very clear: do not send any code which generates any warning. For GCC
>> this means W=1 builds.
> I don't find about the warning about GCC when compile yaml file.
> and I dont't know the meaning about W=1, you said about "W=1" is to execute
> following command to compile the yaml, right?

GCC is about your C code. You were sending patches knowing that they
have warnings. It's not good. All warnings must be fixed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof