[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <270b0dfe-25fb-b5a1-e0cc-6a284367a173@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 15:14:24 +0530
From: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Update SNPS Phy params for
SC7280
On 9/29/2022 2:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/09/2022 11:02, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Sept 2022 at 11:54, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
>> <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/29/2022 1:29 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 29 Sept 2022 at 10:14, Krishna Kurapati
>>>> <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Override the SNPS Phy tuning parameters for SC7280 devices. These
>>>>> values are common for both trogdor and herobrine variants.
>>>>
>>>> They are common for trogdor and herobrine, but should these parameters
>>>> be a default? In other words, a random new device based on sc7280
>>>> would more likely use these overrides or the hardware defaults?
>>>>
>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>
>>> Currently there are only two platforms, so I made these changes on
>>> common dtsi. If a new platform comes (mostly it won't) we can override
>>> them in platform specific file is what I thought.
>>
Hi Dmitry, Krzysztof,
>> This is not how it usually works. The 'sc7280.dtsi' is not a 'common
>> dtsi' for trogdor and herobrine. It describes the SoC.
>> Thus in my opinion if these overrides should be a default to all
>> sc7280 platforms, this patch is fine. If these overrides are
>> applicable only to the two mentioned platforms, they should go to
>> respective platform-specific DT files.
>
> Dmitry's conclusion is correct here. The true question is whether these
> are properties of the SoC itself (so do not depend on the board or board
> layout) or these depend on design of board.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks for the info. These parameters are per-board and not common to
SoC. I sent one patch previously for IDP platform [1]. I will let that
get merged and I will send a v2 of this patch adding parameters only for
herobrine platform.
[1] :
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-usb/patch/1662480933-12326-4-git-send-email-quic_kriskura@quicinc.com/
Thanks,
Krishna,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists