[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzVrbHw9LMoTjYzI@unreal>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:54:52 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Christian Langrock <christian.langrock@...unet.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec v3] xfrm: replay: Fix ESN wrap around for GSO
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 07:59:31AM +0200, Christian Langrock wrote:
> When using GSO it can happen that the wrong seq_hi is used for the last
> packets before the wrap around. This can lead to double usage of a
> sequence number. To avoid this, we should serialize this last GSO
> packet.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - fix build
> - remove wrapper function
>
> Changes in v2:
> - switch to bool as return value
> - remove switch case in wrapper function
>
> Fixes: d7dbefc45cf5 ("xfrm: Add xfrm_replay_overflow functions for...")
> Signed-off-by: Christian Langrock <christian.langrock@...unet.com>
> ---
Please put changelog after "---" trailer.
> include/net/xfrm.h | 1 +
> net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c | 2 +-
> net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
> index 6e8fa98f786f..b845f911767c 100644
> --- a/include/net/xfrm.h
> +++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
> @@ -1749,6 +1749,7 @@ void xfrm_replay_advance(struct xfrm_state *x, __be32 net_seq);
> int xfrm_replay_check(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 net_seq);
> void xfrm_replay_notify(struct xfrm_state *x, int event);
> int xfrm_replay_overflow(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb);
> +bool xfrm_replay_overflow_check(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb);
> int xfrm_replay_recheck(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 net_seq);
>
> static inline int xfrm_aevent_is_on(struct net *net)
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> index 9a5e79a38c67..c470a68d9c88 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c
> @@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ int xfrm_output(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> skb->encapsulation = 1;
>
> if (skb_is_gso(skb)) {
> - if (skb->inner_protocol)
> + if (skb->inner_protocol || xfrm_replay_overflow_check(x, skb))
> return xfrm_output_gso(net, sk, skb);
>
> skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type |= SKB_GSO_ESP;
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
> index 9277d81b344c..23858eb5eab4 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
> @@ -750,6 +750,27 @@ int xfrm_replay_overflow(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
>
> return xfrm_replay_overflow_offload(x, skb);
> }
> +
> +static bool xfrm_replay_overflow_check(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_esn = x->replay_esn;
> + __u32 oseq = replay_esn->oseq;
> +
> + /* We assume that this function is called with
> + * skb_is_gso(skb) == true
> + */
> +
> + if (x->repl_mode == XFRM_REPLAY_MODE_ESN) {
> + if (x->type->flags & XFRM_TYPE_REPLAY_PROT) {
It can be one if( ... && ...), but not critical.
Once you fix commit message, feel free to add my tag.
Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists