[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9f6ab17-153e-23a7-a55a-37bd3d71b399@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 17:58:30 +0800
From: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] entry: Remove has_signal comment of
arch_do_signal_or_restart() prototype
On 09/03/2022 07:10 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 11:41:46AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>> The argument has_signal of arch_do_signal_or_restart() has been removed
>> in commit 8ba62d37949e ("task_work: Call tracehook_notify_signal from
>> get_signal on all architectures"), let us remove the related comment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
>
> Fixes: 8ba62d37949e ("task_work: Call tracehook_notify_signal from get_signal on all architectures")
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
Hi all,
Do you know which tree this patch will go through?
Thanks,
Tiezhu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists