[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzV/yT6OYMgaq0kD@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:21:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@....com>
Cc: Jian-Min Liu <jian-min.liu@...iatek.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@...bug.net>,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...cinc.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan JMChen <jonathan.jmchen@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] sched/pelt: Change PELT halflife at runtime
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:10:17PM +0100, Kajetan Puchalski wrote:
> Overall, the problem being solved here is that based on our testing the
> PELT half life can occasionally be too slow to keep up in scenarios
> where many frames need to be rendered quickly, especially on high-refresh
> rate phones and similar devices.
But it is a problem of DVFS not ramping up quick enough; or of the
load-balancer not reacting to the increase in load, or what aspect
controlled by PELT is responsible for the improvement seen?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists