[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9368c760191448bba0e062709cc7c799@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:53:17 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Hugh Dickins' <hughd@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
CC: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: RE: amusing SLUB compaction bug when CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE
> -static void rcu_free_slab(struct rcu_head *h)
> +/*
> + * rcu_free_slab() must be __aligned(4) because its address is saved
> + * in the rcu_head field, which coincides with page->mapping, which
> + * causes trouble if compaction mistakes it for PAGE_MAPPING_MOVABLE.
> + */
> +__aligned(4) static void rcu_free_slab(struct rcu_head *h)
> {
> struct slab *slab = container_of(h, struct slab, rcu_head);
>
Isn't that going to cause grief with options that align
functions on 16/32byte boundaries when adding space for
'other stuff'?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists