[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8286def4-8086-9014-7893-afa805bd2afc@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 20:33:13 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: babu.moger@....com
Cc: corbet@....net, reinette.chatre@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, songmuchun@...edance.com,
peterz@...radead.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
sandipan.das@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 12/12] Documentation/x86: Update resctrl_ui.rst for new
features
On 9/29/22 20:22, Moger, Babu wrote:
>>>> Also, there isn't description of mapping from bits from the supported events
>>>> table to the bytes input for mbm_{total,local}_config.
>>> It is already there. Is that not clear?
>> No. I don't see why setting bits 0, 1, 4, and 5 on domain 0 translates to
>> `0:0x33`, for example.
>
> It is 110011b(binary) which is 0x33. I can make that little more clear.
>
Ah! I see that flipping bits in order to to set the flag. Thanks for
the explanation.
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists