[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f704d2f-12b5-8d6a-357e-d79b1e871ed7@leemhuis.info>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 16:02:56 +0200
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Artem S. Tashkinov" <aros@....com>, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
ksummit@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Planned changes for bugzilla.kernel.org to reduce the "Bugzilla
blues"
On 29.09.22 15:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:33:53 +0200
> Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info> wrote:
>
> Thanks Thorsten for doing this.
Thx for saying this, as I fear it in the end will again be more work
then anticipated -- but well, that's how life often is :-D
>>> * In the kernel summit sessions (recording:
>>> https://youtu.be/e2SZoUPhDRg?t=5370 ) Len Brown stated that he and
>>> fellow ACPI/PM developers rely on bugzilla.kernel.org and would need
>>> some replacement if it's decommissioned.
>
> I also use bugzilla.kernel.org with trace-cmd/kernelshark and the
> libraries, although I don't really use it for the Linux tracing subsystem
> (but I probably should :-/).
>
> That is, the tools portion of bugzilla is not part of the MAINTAINERS file
> (that I know of), so probably shouldn't be affected by this.
Ohh, yeah, sorry, should have mentioned this. Don't worry, I'm aware of
this particular and a few similar products/components in bugzilla. I
don't plan changing any of them, unless something unforeseen or a very
good reason comes up (for example if they're obviously unused for years
or something like that).
Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists