[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d28c2b1c-a974-1622-e817-942ff28ade24@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 08:27:38 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: "tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com" <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] selftests/resctrl: Clear unused initalization code in
MBM tests
Hi Shaopeng,
On 9/28/2022 10:28 PM, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com wrote:
>> On 9/27/2022 2:01 AM, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com wrote:
>>>> On 9/13/2022 6:51 PM, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
>>>>> There is a comment "Set up shemata with 100% allocation on the first run"
>>>>> in function mbm_setup(), but the condition "num_of_runs == 0" will
>>>>> never be met and write_schemata() will never be called to set
>>>>> schemata to 100%.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for catching this.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Since umount/mount resctrl file system is run on each resctrl test,
>>>>> at the same time the default schemata will also be set to 100%.
>>>>
>>>> This is the case when a test is run with struct
>>>> resctrl_val_param->mum_resctrlfs == 1, but if the test is run with
>>>> struct resctrl_val_param->mum_resctrlfs == 0 then resctrl filesystem
>>>> will not be remounted.
>>>>
>>>> I do think that this setup function should support both cases.
>>>
>>> In mbm test(mbm_test.c), resctrl_val_param.mum_resctrlfs is set to 1
>>> and never be changed, and umount/mount resctrl file system is always
>> executed.
>>> So it is not necessary to run "if (num_of_runs == 0)".
>>
>> This is true for the current usage. You could also add a warning here ("running
>> test with stale config") if a future test sets mum_resctrlfs - but with all the
>> current output of the selftests a warning may be lost in the noise.
>>
>> I think it would just be simpler to support both cases. Having the tests be more
>> robust is good.
>
> I understand that mum_resctrlfs should support both cases(0&1).
>
> However, "num_of_runs++" is executed before "if (num_of_runs == 0)",
> So write_schemata() is never executed regardless of mum_rectrlfs is 0 or 1.
>
> 97 if (num_of_runs++ >= NUM_OF_RUNS)
> 105 if (num_of_runs == 0)
> 106 ret = write_schemata(p->ctrlgrp, "100", p->cpu_no,
>
> I will fix this in the next version
>
Thank you very much.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists