linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] ACPI: resources: Add wake_capable parameter to acpi_dev_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i+QYcMuqsK9y6qy9qzJdUp503Sidr1e4V_ROyumLKCsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 19:13:37 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        Tim Van Patten <timvp@...gle.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "jingle.wu" <jingle.wu@....com.tw>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Terry Bowman <terry.bowman@....com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/13] ACPI: resources: Add wake_capable parameter to acpi_dev_irq_flags

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 1:22 AM Dmitry Torokhov
<dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:20:12PM -0600, Raul Rangel wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 1:38 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 9:27 PM Raul Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 1:18 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 6:19 PM Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ACPI IRQ/Interrupt resources contain a bit that describes if the
> > > > > > interrupt should wake the system. This change exposes that bit via
> > > > > > a new IORESOURCE_IRQ_WAKECAPABLE flag. Drivers should check this flag
> > > > >
> > > > > I would call this IORESOURCE_IRQ_WAKE which is (a) simpler and easier
> > > > > to read and (b) it sort of matches the "wakeirq" naming convention.
> > > >
> > > > It was Dmitry who originally suggested the name. I personally like the
> > > > CAPABLE in the name. It makes it clear that it's capable of acting as
> > > > a wake source, not to be confused with being enabled as a wake source.
> > >
> > > Well, so be it then.
> > >
> > > As I said elsewhere, I can apply this patch too if that's useful at this point.
> > >
> >
> > We just need to make sure the ACPI patches 5-8 land before the i2c
> > patches 9-13. The i2c patches 1-4 can land before or after the ACPI
> > changes. I'm not sure how things get coordinated across subsystems.
>
> I am fine with all input stuff going through ACPI tree to ease landing.
> Or I can pick up everything if Rafael and Jiri/Benjamin agree.

I think that patches [5-8/13] from this series are significant
framework changes, so it would make sense to route them via the ACPI
tree.

If this is fine with everybody, I will queue them up for merging into
6.1 (probably in the second half of the upcoming merge window).