lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:04:50 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Li Zhijian <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
Cc:     Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@...il.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>, yangx.jy@...itsu.com,
        y-goto@...itsu.com, mbloch@...dia.com, liangwenpeng@...wei.com,
        tom@...pey.com, tomasz.gromadzki@...el.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [for-next PATCH v5 03/11] RDMA: Extend RDMA kernel verbs ABI to
 support flush

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 02:21:24PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:

> we can see, IBV_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC and IBV_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND are
> tagged "if supported" . but currently kernel just returns EINVAL
> when user registers a MR with IB_ACCESS_ON_DEMAND to RXE.
>
> I wonder we should return -EOPNOTSUPP if the device doesn't support requested capabilities

Yes, unsupported combinations of access flags should trigger
EOPNOTSUPP

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ