lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ab0d9840-07e3-ec49-a9b3-c4b65d7d61bc@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:09:34 -0700
From:   Anirudh Venkataramanan <anirudh.venkataramanan@...el.com>
To:     Robert Elliott <elliott@....com>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <jarod@...hat.com>,
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: tcrypt - fix return value for multiple subtests

On 9/30/2022 2:40 PM, Robert Elliott wrote:
> When a test mode invokes multiple tests (e.g., mode 0 invokes modes
> 1 through 199, and mode 3 tests three block cipher modes with des),
> don't keep accumulating the return values with ret += tcrypt_test(),
> which results in a bogus value if more than one report a nonzero
> value (e.g., two reporting -2 (-ENOENT) end up reporting -4 (-EINTR)).
> Instead, keep track of the minimum return value reported by any
> subtest.

I am assuming this is for the case when fips_enabled is true?

I agree that returning the cumulative sum or errors isn't particularly 
useful, but how is returning the minimum error value useful? Wouldn't it 
be more useful to return the first error return?

Ani

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ