linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: Fix client_count is countered one more incorrectly.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJB-X+X2k_TCvocoiFsPr=ehSMOHZkBkOv_P540q=_jmxXgYTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 14:25:11 +0800
From:   Koba Ko <koba.ko@...onical.com>
To:     Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>
Cc:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: Fix client_count is countered one more incorrectly.

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 1:56 PM Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:44:22PM +0800, Koba Ko wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 1:26 AM Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 22:40 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > On 29-09-22, 09:57, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 05:32:07PM +0800, Koba Ko wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Vinod,
> > > > >
> > > > > Any thoughts on this patch? We recently came across this issue as
> > > > > well.
> > > >
> > > > I have only patch 3, where is the rest of the series... ?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I never found anything else when I looked at this earlier.
> > > The one thing I can think of is perhaps Koba was seeing multiple
> > > issues at time when he found this, like:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20220901144712.1192698-1-koba.ko@canonical.com/
> > >
> > > That was also being seen by an engineer here that was looking
> > > at client_count code.
> > >
> > > Koba, was this meant to be part of a series, or by itself?
> > >
> >
> > Jerry, you're right, it's a part of the series.
>
> Hi Koba,
>
> If it is meant to be part of a series, where are patches 1 and 2?
> The ccp patch has already been applied by the crypto maintainers if that
> was meant to be part of a series with this patch.
>
> Regards,
> Jerry

Sorry, I misunderstood. actually, there's a mistake on the [3/3] part.
I created patches for the mainline kernel before sending them to the upstream.
Then I found the first has existed on the patchwork, so removed the
[2/3] part for ccp patch and forgot to modify for this.
Should I fix this and re-submit v2(also add those review-by)?

>
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jerry
> > >
>