linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 3/6] scsi: pm8001: Remove pm8001_tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1664528184-162714-4-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 16:56:21 +0800
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>, <damien.lemoal@....com>
CC:     <hare@...e.de>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        <ipylypiv@...gle.com>, <changyuanl@...gle.com>, <hch@....de>,
        <yanaijie@...wei.com>, John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] scsi: pm8001: Remove pm8001_tag_init()

From: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>

In commit 5a141315ed7c ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase the number of outstanding
I/O supported to 1024") the pm8001_ha->tags allocation was moved into
pm8001_init_ccb_tag(). This changed the execution order of allocation.
pm8001_tag_init() used to be called after the pm8001_ha->tags allocation
and now it is called before the allocation.

Before:

pm8001_pci_probe()
`--> pm8001_pci_alloc()
     `--> pm8001_alloc()
          `--> pm8001_ha->tags = kzalloc(...)
          `--> pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha); // OK: tags are allocated

After:

pm8001_pci_probe()
`--> pm8001_pci_alloc()
|    `--> pm8001_alloc()
|         `--> pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha); // NOK: tags are not allocated
|
`--> pm8001_init_ccb_tag()
     `-->  pm8001_ha->tags = kzalloc(...) // today it is bitmap_zalloc()

Since pm8001_ha->tags_num is zero when pm8001_tag_init() is called it does
nothing. Tags memory is allocated with bitmap_zalloc() so there is no need
to manually clear each bit with pm8001_tag_free().

Reviewed-by: Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c | 2 --
 drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c  | 7 -------
 drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h  | 1 -
 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
index a0028e130a7e..0edc9857a8bd 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
@@ -436,8 +436,6 @@ static int pm8001_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
 		atomic_set(&pm8001_ha->devices[i].running_req, 0);
 	}
 	pm8001_ha->flags = PM8001F_INIT_TIME;
-	/* Initialize tags */
-	pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha);
 	return 0;
 
 err_out_nodev:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
index d5ec29f69be3..066dfa9f4683 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c
@@ -96,13 +96,6 @@ int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-void pm8001_tag_init(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
-{
-	int i;
-	for (i = 0; i < pm8001_ha->tags_num; ++i)
-		pm8001_tag_free(pm8001_ha, i);
-}
-
 /**
  * pm8001_mem_alloc - allocate memory for pm8001.
  * @pdev: pci device.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
index 8ab0654327f9..9acaadf02150 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
@@ -632,7 +632,6 @@ extern struct workqueue_struct *pm8001_wq;
 
 /******************** function prototype *********************/
 int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out);
-void pm8001_tag_init(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha);
 u32 pm8001_get_ncq_tag(struct sas_task *task, u32 *tag);
 void pm8001_ccb_task_free(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
 			  struct pm8001_ccb_info *ccb);
-- 
2.35.3