lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e0fdf8f0-0f20-1231-0734-7559aa517de2@loongson.cn>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 09:39:14 +0800
From:   Yinbo Zhu <zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     zhanghongchen <zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn>,
        Liu Peibao <liupeibao@...ngson.cn>, zhuyinbo@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: thermal: add loongson2k thermal
 binding



在 2022/9/29 下午3:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
> On 29/09/2022 09:07, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ... and please test your patches before sending :(
>>>> You said is refer that "reg: [[0, 534779136], [0, 48]] is too long" ?
>>>> Need fix that warning, right?
>>>
>>> Yes. You said you tested it but then sent with an error... so it's not
>>> really a testing.
>> sorry, I did do some testing. but I think It is okay that can generate a
>> dtb  without reporting an error when compile yaml file, in fact, I
>> ignore the warning,  I will fix it in v6.
> 
> 
> Do you also send the code with warnings reported by GCC? Judging by
> number of kernel test robot reports, it could be. So just to be very,
> very clear: do not send any code which generates any warning. For GCC
> this means W=1 builds.
When use W=1, I can reproduce the warning and I will fix it in v7.

BRs,
Yinbo Zhu.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ