[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220930020355.98534-1-parav@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 05:03:55 +0300
From: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
To: <bagasdotme@...il.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<stern@...land.harvard.edu>, <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
<will@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
<npiggin@...il.com>, <dhowells@...hat.com>, <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
<luc.maranget@...ia.fr>, <paulmck@...nel.org>, <akiyks@...il.com>,
<dlustig@...dia.com>, <joel@...lfernandes.org>, <corbet@....net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1] locking/memory-barriers.txt: Improve documentation for writel() usage
The cited commit describes that when using writel(), explcit wmb()
is not needed. wmb() is an expensive barrier. writel() uses the needed
I/O barrier instead of expensive wmb().
Hence update the example to be more accurate that matches the current
implementation.
commit 5846581e3563 ("locking/memory-barriers.txt: Fix broken DMA vs. MMIO ordering example")
Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
---
changelog:
v0->v1:
- Corrected to mention I/O barrier instead of dma_wmb().
- removed numbered references in commit log
- corrected typo 'explcit' to 'explicit' in commit log
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 832b5d36e279..2d77a7411e52 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -1927,10 +1927,11 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
before we read the data from the descriptor, and the dma_wmb() allows
us to guarantee the data is written to the descriptor before the device
can see it now has ownership. The dma_mb() implies both a dma_rmb() and
- a dma_wmb(). Note that, when using writel(), a prior wmb() is not needed
- to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes have completed before
- writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper writel_relaxed() does not provide
- this guarantee and must not be used here.
+ a dma_wmb(). Note that, when using writel(), a prior I/O barrier is not
+ needed to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes have completed
+ before writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper writel_relaxed() does not
+ provide this guarantee and must not be used here. Hence, writeX() is always
+ preferred.
See the subsection "Kernel I/O barrier effects" for more information on
relaxed I/O accessors and the Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst file for
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists