linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" -> "unprivileged"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 29 Sep 2022 19:14:37 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" ->
 "unprivileged"

Colin Ian King wrote:
> There a couple of spelling mistakes, one in a literal string and one
> in a comment. Fix them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c   | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> index 3fb4f69b1962..e1a937277b54 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@
>  	.result = ACCEPT,
>  },
>  {
> -	"calls: not on unpriviledged",
> +	"calls: not on unprivileged",
>  	.insns = {
>  	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 2),
>  	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
> index 187c6f6e32bc..d37f512fad16 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
>  	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
>  	},
>  	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 1 },
> -	/* The unpriviledged case is not too interesting; variable
> +	/* The unprivileged case is not too interesting; variable
>  	 * stack access is rejected.
>  	 */
>  	.errstr_unpriv = "R2 variable stack access prohibited for !root",
> -- 
> 2.37.1
> 

Sure, but bpf-next.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>