linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs/ntfs3: Avoid UBSAN error on true_sectors_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <136fa55a-56d5-7d62-bbf0-602a357ab46d@paragon-software.com>
Date:   Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:53:30 +0300
From:   Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>
To:     Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
CC:     <ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Author : Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        <syzbot+35b87c668935bb55e666@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ntfs3: Avoid UBSAN error on true_sectors_per_clst()



On 8/23/22 17:46, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> syzbot reported UBSAN error as below:
> 
> [   76.901829][ T6677] ================================================================================
> [   76.903908][ T6677] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in fs/ntfs3/super.c:675:13
> [   76.905363][ T6677] shift exponent -247 is negative
> 
> This patch avoid this error.
> 
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=b0299c09a14aababf0f1c862dd4ebc8ab9eb0179
> Fixes: a3b774342fa7 (fs/ntfs3: validate BOOT sectors_per_clusters)
> Cc: Author: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> Reported-by: syzbot+35b87c668935bb55e666@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
> ---
>   fs/ntfs3/super.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/super.c b/fs/ntfs3/super.c
> index 47012c9bf505..adc4f73722b7 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs3/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs3/super.c
> @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ static u32 true_sectors_per_clst(const struct NTFS_BOOT *boot)
>   	if (boot->sectors_per_clusters <= 0x80)
>   		return boot->sectors_per_clusters;
>   	if (boot->sectors_per_clusters >= 0xf4) /* limit shift to 2MB max */
> -		return 1U << (0 - boot->sectors_per_clusters);
> +		return 1U << -(s8)boot->sectors_per_clusters;
>   	return -EINVAL;
>   }
>   

Applied, thanks again for the patch!