linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] clk: qcom: Add support for QDU1000 and QRU1000 RPMh clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 1 Oct 2022 10:03:00 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] clk: qcom: Add support for QDU1000 and QRU1000 RPMh clocks

On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 06:05, Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> Add support for RMPh clocks for QDU1000 and QRU1000 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Melody Olvera <quic_molvera@...cinc.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> index c07cab6905cb..27d11ffac71e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpmh.c
> @@ -628,6 +628,18 @@ static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_sdx65 = {
>         .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sdx65_rpmh_clocks),
>  };
>
> +DEFINE_CLK_RPMH_ARC(qdru1000, bi_tcxo, bi_tcxo_ao, "xo.lvl", 0x3, 1);
> +
> +static struct clk_hw *qdru1000_rpmh_clocks[] = {
> +       [RPMH_CXO_CLK]      = &qdru1000_bi_tcxo.hw,
> +       [RPMH_CXO_CLK_A]    = &qdru1000_bi_tcxo_ao.hw,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_rpmh_desc clk_rpmh_qdru1000 = {
> +       .clks = qdru1000_rpmh_clocks,
> +       .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(qdru1000_rpmh_clocks),
> +};
> +
>  static struct clk_hw *of_clk_rpmh_hw_get(struct of_phandle_args *clkspec,
>                                          void *data)
>  {
> @@ -723,6 +735,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id clk_rpmh_match_table[] = {
>         { .compatible = "qcom,sm8350-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8350},
>         { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8450},
>         { .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sc7280},
> +       { .compatible = "qcom,qdu1000-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_qdru1000},
> +       { .compatible = "qcom,qru1000-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_qdru1000},

Also the list isn't fully sorted, let's target that. Please move your
compat strings into the beginning.

>         { }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, clk_rpmh_match_table);
> --
> 2.37.3
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry