linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] kunit: more assertion reworking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72nU-eDOT94q26dTVgCFA_Hs1cGiLpDCmQ5n-cCVKAcsqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 1 Oct 2022 12:15:39 +0200
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc:     brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] kunit: more assertion reworking

On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 2:26 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Note: this does change the function signature of
> kunit_do_failed_assertion, so we'd need to update the rust wrapper in
> https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/rust/rust/kernel/kunit.rs,
> but hopefully it's just a simple change, e.g. maybe just like:

Yeah, should be simple. Thanks for pointing it out!

The series looks like a great cleanup on top of the stack reduction.

Cheers,
Miguel