[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN0PR02MB8142577BE680E27952F912A296599@BN0PR02MB8142.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2022 14:25:38 +0000
From: Kalyan Thota <kalyant@....qualcomm.com>
To: "dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org" <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
"Kalyan Thota (QUIC)" <quic_kalyant@...cinc.com>
CC: "y@...lcomm.com" <y@...lcomm.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
"Vinod Polimera (QUIC)" <quic_vpolimer@...cinc.com>,
"Abhinav Kumar (QUIC)" <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
Subject: RE: [v5] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: add support for dspp sub block flush in
sc7280
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 1:59 PM
>To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>; Kalyan Thota (QUIC)
><quic_kalyant@...cinc.com>
>Cc: y@...lcomm.com; dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>; linux-arm-
>msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>; freedreno
><freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>; open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED
>DEVICE TREE BINDINGS <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>; LKML <linux-
>kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>; Stephen Boyd
><swboyd@...omium.org>; Vinod Polimera (QUIC)
><quic_vpolimer@...cinc.com>; Abhinav Kumar (QUIC)
><quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>
>Subject: Re: [v5] drm/msm/disp/dpu1: add support for dspp sub block flush in
>sc7280
>
>WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of
>any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
>
>On 29 September 2022 19:13:20 GMT+03:00, Doug Anderson
><dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 5:16 AM Kalyan Thota <quic_kalyant@...cinc.com>
>wrote:
>>>
>>> Flush mechanism for DSPP blocks has changed in sc7280 family, it
>>> allows individual sub blocks to be flushed in coordination with
>>> master flush control.
>>>
>>> Representation: master_flush && (PCC_flush | IGC_flush .. etc )
>>>
>>> This change adds necessary support for the above design.
>>>
>>> Changes in v1:
>>> - Few nits (Doug, Dmitry)
>>> - Restrict sub-block flush programming to dpu_hw_ctl file (Dmitry)
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Move the address offset to flush macro (Dmitry)
>>> - Seperate ops for the sub block flush (Dmitry)
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Reuse the DPU_DSPP_xx enum instead of a new one (Dmitry)
>>>
>>> Changes in v4:
>>> - Use shorter version for unsigned int (Stephen)
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 5 +++-
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 4 +++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c | 35
>++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h | 10 ++++++--
>>> 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>>Breadcrumbs: though this is tagged in the subject as v5 I think the
>>newest version is actually "resend v4" [1] which just fixes the
>>Signed-off-by.
>
>Not to mention that v5 misses the S-o-B tag.
>
>>
>>[1]
>>https://lore.kernel.org/r/1663825463-6715-1-git-send-email-quic_kalyant
>>@quicinc.com
>
Latest one is https://lore.kernel.org/r/1663825463-6715-1-git-send-email-quic_kalyant@quicinc.com that I last posted.
Don’t recollect on why tag was marked as v5. To avoid confusion, shall I resend it again ?
>--
>With best wishes
>Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists