| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4d9d7795-7e98-5bca-14fd-8e8f86da31b3@igalia.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2022 14:42:18 -0300
From: Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Dom Cobley <dom@...pberrypi.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>,
nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Mateusz Kwiatkowski <kfyatek+publicgit@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/30] drm/client: Add some tests for
drm_connector_pick_cmdline_mode()
On 9/29/22 13:31, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> drm_connector_pick_cmdline_mode() is in charge of finding a proper
> drm_display_mode from the definition we got in the video= command line
> argument.
>
> Let's add some unit tests to make sure we're not getting any regressions
> there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Removed MODULE macros
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c | 4 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> index bbc535cc50dd..d553e793e673 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client_modeset.c
> @@ -1237,3 +1237,7 @@ int drm_client_modeset_dpms(struct drm_client_dev *client, int mode)
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_client_modeset_dpms);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_KUNIT_TEST
> +#include "tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c"
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..09dc5acbbc42
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
> + */
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +#include <drm/drm_connector.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_edid.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_modes.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_modeset_helper_vtables.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
> +
> +#include "drm_kunit_helpers.h"
> +
> +struct drm_client_modeset_test_priv {
> + struct drm_device *drm;
> + struct drm_connector connector;
> +};
> +
> +static int drm_client_modeset_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
> +{
> + struct drm_display_mode *mode;
Small nit: I guess this should be added on patch 21/30, as it is not
being currently used.
> + int count;
> +
> + count = drm_add_modes_noedid(connector, 1920, 1200);
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct drm_connector_helper_funcs drm_client_modeset_connector_helper_funcs = {
> + .get_modes = drm_client_modeset_connector_get_modes,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct drm_connector_funcs drm_client_modeset_connector_funcs = {
> +};
> +
> +static int drm_client_modeset_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct drm_client_modeset_test_priv *priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + priv = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!priv)
> + return -ENOMEM;
I believe it would be nicer to use KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL here, instead
of returning a error.
> + test->priv = priv;
> +
> + priv->drm = drm_kunit_device_init(test, "drm-client-modeset-test");
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->drm))
> + return PTR_ERR(priv->drm);
Here you could use KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL.
> +
> + ret = drmm_connector_init(priv->drm, &priv->connector,
> + &drm_client_modeset_connector_funcs,
> + DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_Unknown,
> + NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
Same idea here. This would make it more compliant to the KUnit API.
> + drm_connector_helper_add(&priv->connector, &drm_client_modeset_connector_helper_funcs);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void drm_pick_cmdline_res_1920_1080_60(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct drm_client_modeset_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
> + struct drm_device *drm = priv->drm;
> + struct drm_connector *connector = &priv->connector;
> + struct drm_cmdline_mode *cmdline_mode = &connector->cmdline_mode;
> + struct drm_display_mode *expected_mode, *mode;
> + const char *cmdline = "1920x1080@60";
> + int ret;
> +
> + expected_mode = drm_mode_find_dmt(priv->drm, 1920, 1080, 60, false);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, expected_mode, NULL);
You could use KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL here.
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test,
> + drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector(cmdline,
> + connector,
> + cmdline_mode));
> +
> + mutex_lock(&drm->mode_config.mutex);
> + ret = drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes(connector, 1920, 1080);
> + mutex_unlock(&drm->mode_config.mutex);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, ret, 0);
> +
> + mode = drm_connector_pick_cmdline_mode(connector);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, mode, NULL);
You could also use KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL here.
This idea could also apply to the patches 21/30 and 22/30, which have a
similar structure and are also using KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE.
Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, drm_mode_equal(expected_mode, mode));
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case drm_pick_cmdline_tests[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(drm_pick_cmdline_res_1920_1080_60),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite drm_pick_cmdline_test_suite = {
> + .name = "drm_pick_cmdline",
> + .init = drm_client_modeset_test_init,
> + .test_cases = drm_pick_cmdline_tests
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suite(drm_pick_cmdline_test_suite);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists