| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20221001203717.3cgzlh3xeadk45ia@SoMainline.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2022 22:37:17 +0200
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/msm/dsi: Account for DSC's bits_per_pixel having
4 fractional bits
Doing some self-review as these patches accrued some bit-rot while
waiting to be sent.
On 2022-10-01 21:08:05, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> drm_dsc_config's bits_per_pixel field holds a fractional value with 4
> bits, which all panel drivers should adhere to for
> drm_dsc_pps_payload_pack() to generate a valid payload. All code in the
> DSI driver here seems to assume that this field doesn't contain any
> fractional bits, hence resulting in the wrong values being computed.
> Since none of the calculations leave any room for fractional bits or
> seem to indicate any possible area of support, disallow such values
> altogether.
>
> Fixes: b9080324d6ca ("drm/msm/dsi: add support for dsc data")
> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> index cb6f2fa11f58..42a5c9776f52 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> @@ -847,6 +847,11 @@ static void dsi_update_dsc_timing(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_cmd_mod
> u32 pkt_per_line;
> u32 bytes_in_slice;
> u32 eol_byte_num;
> + int bpp = dsc->bits_per_pixel >> 4;
This should have been u16 instead of int.
> +
> + if (dsc->bits_per_pixel & 0xf)
Should there be a define for this mask?
> + /* dsi_populate_dsc_params() already caught this case */
> + pr_err("DSI does not support fractional bits_per_pixel\n");
This file mostly uses pr_err(), but it's probably cleaner to use
DRM_DEV_ERROR(&msm_host->pdev->dev, ...) even though it's not prevalent
yet?
>
> /* first calculate dsc parameters and then program
> * compress mode registers
> @@ -860,7 +865,7 @@ static void dsi_update_dsc_timing(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_cmd_mod
> if (slice_per_intf > dsc->slice_count)
> dsc->slice_count = 1;
>
> - bytes_in_slice = DIV_ROUND_UP(dsc->slice_width * dsc->bits_per_pixel, 8);
> + bytes_in_slice = DIV_ROUND_UP(dsc->slice_width * bpp, 8);
>
> dsc->slice_chunk_size = bytes_in_slice;
>
> @@ -913,6 +918,7 @@ static void dsi_timing_setup(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_bonded_dsi)
> u32 va_end = va_start + mode->vdisplay;
> u32 hdisplay = mode->hdisplay;
> u32 wc;
> + int ret;
>
> DBG("");
>
> @@ -948,7 +954,9 @@ static void dsi_timing_setup(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host, bool is_bonded_dsi)
> /* we do the calculations for dsc parameters here so that
> * panel can use these parameters
> */
> - dsi_populate_dsc_params(dsc);
> + ret = dsi_populate_dsc_params(dsc);
> + if (ret)
> + return;
>
> /* Divide the display by 3 but keep back/font porch and
> * pulse width same
> @@ -1229,6 +1237,10 @@ static int dsi_cmd_dma_add(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host,
> if (packet.size < len)
> memset(data + packet.size, 0xff, len - packet.size);
>
> + if (msg->type == MIPI_DSI_PICTURE_PARAMETER_SET)
> + print_hex_dump(KERN_DEBUG, "ALL:", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE,
> + 16, 1, data, len, false);
> +
> if (cfg_hnd->ops->tx_buf_put)
> cfg_hnd->ops->tx_buf_put(msm_host);
>
> @@ -1786,6 +1798,12 @@ static int dsi_populate_dsc_params(struct drm_dsc_config *dsc)
> int data;
> int final_value, final_scale;
> int i;
> + int bpp = dsc->bits_per_pixel >> 4;
Same u16 here.
- Marijn
> +
> + if (dsc->bits_per_pixel & 0xf) {
> + pr_err("DSI does not support fractional bits_per_pixel\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> dsc->rc_model_size = 8192;
> dsc->first_line_bpg_offset = 12;
> @@ -1807,7 +1825,7 @@ static int dsi_populate_dsc_params(struct drm_dsc_config *dsc)
> }
>
> dsc->initial_offset = 6144; /* Not bpp 12 */
> - if (dsc->bits_per_pixel != 8)
> + if (bpp != 8)
> dsc->initial_offset = 2048; /* bpp = 12 */
>
> mux_words_size = 48; /* bpc == 8/10 */
> @@ -1830,16 +1848,16 @@ static int dsi_populate_dsc_params(struct drm_dsc_config *dsc)
> * params are calculated
> */
> groups_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(dsc->slice_width, 3);
> - dsc->slice_chunk_size = dsc->slice_width * dsc->bits_per_pixel / 8;
> - if ((dsc->slice_width * dsc->bits_per_pixel) % 8)
> + dsc->slice_chunk_size = dsc->slice_width * bpp / 8;
> + if ((dsc->slice_width * bpp) % 8)
> dsc->slice_chunk_size++;
>
> /* rbs-min */
> min_rate_buffer_size = dsc->rc_model_size - dsc->initial_offset +
> - dsc->initial_xmit_delay * dsc->bits_per_pixel +
> + dsc->initial_xmit_delay * bpp +
> groups_per_line * dsc->first_line_bpg_offset;
>
> - hrd_delay = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_rate_buffer_size, dsc->bits_per_pixel);
> + hrd_delay = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_rate_buffer_size, bpp);
>
> dsc->initial_dec_delay = hrd_delay - dsc->initial_xmit_delay;
>
> @@ -1862,7 +1880,7 @@ static int dsi_populate_dsc_params(struct drm_dsc_config *dsc)
> data = 2048 * (dsc->rc_model_size - dsc->initial_offset + num_extra_mux_bits);
> dsc->slice_bpg_offset = DIV_ROUND_UP(data, groups_total);
>
> - target_bpp_x16 = dsc->bits_per_pixel * 16;
> + target_bpp_x16 = bpp * 16;
>
> data = (dsc->initial_xmit_delay * target_bpp_x16) / 16;
> final_value = dsc->rc_model_size - data + num_extra_mux_bits;
> --
> 2.37.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists