[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ba8f523-dc55-1f12-729e-c65d741c4175@tom-fitzhenry.me.uk>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 20:35:14 +1100
From: Tom Fitzhenry <tom@...-fitzhenry.me.uk>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Caleb Connolly <kc@...tmarketos.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add BT/wifi nodes to Pinephone Pro
Hi Caleb and Heiko,
Thank you for your reviews.
On 7/9/22 18:26, Heiko Stübner wrote:
>>> + /* Power sequence for SDIO WiFi module */
>>
>> This comment isn't needed, instead give the node a better name/label
>>> + sdio_pwrseq: sdio-pwrseq {
>>
>> wifi_pwrseq: sdio-pwrseq-wifi {
>
> I guess, I'd move the components around a tiny bit and go with
>
> wifi_pwrseq: sdio-wifi-pwrseq {
>
> So far everywhere the "-pwrseq" is at the end and while I don't
> think that this is enforced (yet), keeping some sort of consistency
> might be nice :-)
Done. I have applied this in v2.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists