[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yzl16W6+poH8/8h4@shikoro>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 13:28:41 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>
Cc: Arminder Singh <arminders208@...look.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
asahi@...ts.linux.dev, Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Darren Stevens <darren@...vens-zone.net>,
Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@...osoft.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c/pasemi: PASemi I2C controller IRQ enablement
Hi,
some comments from me. Thanks for the patch and review!
> > This version of the patch has been tested on an M1 Ultra Mac Studio,
> > as well as an M1 MacBook Pro, and userspace launches successfully
> > while using the IRQ path for I2C transactions.
> >
> > Tested-by: Arminder Singh <arminders208@...look.com>
>
> I think it's usually implied that you tested your own patches ;)
Yes, the tag is superfluous. The paragraph before is nice, though, to
learn which testing has been applied.
> > make sure to be more responsive this time around! Also wasn't sure whether
> > the v1 changelog belonged before or after the '---' so I put it after
> > to keep the commit changelog short and concise.
> > (This is just one patch, didn't think it needed a cover letter)
Both assumptions are correct.
Happy hacking,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists