| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20221002171012.3529521-1-void@manifault.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 12:10:12 -0500
From: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev, memxor@...il.com
Cc: kernel-team@...com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yhs@...com, song@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] selftests/bpf: Update map_kptr examples to reflect real use-cases
In the map_kptr selftest, the bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get() kfunc is used
to verify and illustrate a typical use case of kptrs wherein an additional
reference is taken on a referenced kptr that is already stored in a map.
This would be useful for programs that, for example, want to pass the
referenced kptr to a kfunc without removing it from the map.
Unfortunately, the implementation of bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get() isn't
representative of a real kfunc that needs to guard against possible
refcounting races by BPF program callers. bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get()
does a READ_ONCE() on the struct prog_test_ref_kfunc **pp passed by the
user and then calls refcount_inc() if the pointer is nonzero, but this
can race with another callback in the same program that removes the kptr
from the map and frees it:
1. A BPF program with a referenced kptr in a map passes the kptr to
bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get() as:
p = bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get(&v->ref_ptr, 0, 0);
from CPU 0.
2. bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get() does READ_ONCE(), and sees that the
struct prog_test_ref_kfunc **pp contains a non-NULL pointer.
3. Another BPF handler on CPU 1 then invokes bpf_kptr_xchg() to remove
the kptr from the map, and frees it with a call to
bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(). This drops the final refcount on the
kptr.
4. CPU 0 then issues refcount_inc() on the kptr with refcount 0, causing
a use-after-free.
In the map_kptr selftest, this doesn't cause a use-after-free because
the structure being refcounted is statically allocated, and the
refcounts aren't actually used to control the object lifecycle. In a
kfunc supporting a real use case, the refcount going to 0 would likely
cause the object to be freed, as it does for e.g. struct task_struct.
A more realistic use-case would use something like RCU in the kfunc
handler to ensure that the kptr object can be safely accessed, and then
issuing a refcount_inc_not_zero() to acquire a refcount on the object.
This patch updates the map_kptr selftest to do this.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
---
net/bpf/test_run.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c | 4 +--
.../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c | 4 +--
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 13d578ce2a09..3fe9495abcbe 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -565,6 +565,8 @@ struct prog_test_ref_kfunc {
int b;
struct prog_test_member memb;
struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *next;
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+ atomic_t destroyed;
refcount_t cnt;
};
@@ -572,12 +574,14 @@ static struct prog_test_ref_kfunc prog_test_struct = {
.a = 42,
.b = 108,
.next = &prog_test_struct,
+ .destroyed = ATOMIC_INIT(0),
.cnt = REFCOUNT_INIT(1),
};
noinline struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *
bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire(unsigned long *scalar_ptr)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&prog_test_struct.destroyed));
refcount_inc(&prog_test_struct.cnt);
return &prog_test_struct;
}
@@ -589,12 +593,22 @@ bpf_kfunc_call_memb_acquire(void)
return NULL;
}
+static void delayed_destroy_test_ref_struct(struct rcu_head *rhp)
+{
+ struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p = container_of(rhp, struct prog_test_ref_kfunc, rcu);
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(refcount_read(&p->cnt) > 0);
+ atomic_set(&p->destroyed, true);
+}
+
noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_test_release(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p)
{
if (!p)
return;
- refcount_dec(&p->cnt);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&p->destroyed));
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&p->cnt))
+ call_rcu(&p->rcu, delayed_destroy_test_ref_struct);
}
noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_memb_release(struct prog_test_member *p)
@@ -641,11 +655,20 @@ noinline void bpf_kfunc_call_int_mem_release(int *p)
noinline struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *
bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get(struct prog_test_ref_kfunc **pp, int a, int b)
{
- struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p = READ_ONCE(*pp);
+ struct prog_test_ref_kfunc *p;
- if (!p)
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ p = READ_ONCE(*pp);
+ if (!p) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return NULL;
- refcount_inc(&p->cnt);
+ }
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&p->destroyed));
+ if (!refcount_inc_not_zero(&p->cnt))
+ p = NULL;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
return p;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
index fdcea7a61491..1efeec146d8e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/map_kptr.c
@@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ struct {
{ "non_const_var_off_kptr_xchg", "R1 doesn't have constant offset. kptr has to be" },
{ "misaligned_access_write", "kptr access misaligned expected=8 off=7" },
{ "misaligned_access_read", "kptr access misaligned expected=8 off=1" },
- { "reject_var_off_store", "variable untrusted_ptr_ access var_off=(0x0; 0x1e0)" },
+ { "reject_var_off_store", "variable untrusted_ptr_ access var_off=(0x0; 0x3f0)" },
{ "reject_bad_type_match", "invalid kptr access, R1 type=untrusted_ptr_prog_test_ref_kfunc" },
{ "marked_as_untrusted_or_null", "R1 type=untrusted_ptr_or_null_ expected=percpu_ptr_" },
- { "correct_btf_id_check_size", "access beyond struct prog_test_ref_kfunc at off 32 size 4" },
+ { "correct_btf_id_check_size", "access beyond struct prog_test_ref_kfunc at off 48 size 4" },
{ "inherit_untrusted_on_walk", "R1 type=untrusted_ptr_ expected=percpu_ptr_" },
{ "reject_kptr_xchg_on_unref", "off=8 kptr isn't referenced kptr" },
{ "reject_kptr_get_no_map_val", "arg#0 expected pointer to map value" },
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c
index 6914904344c0..d7e76cf81362 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/map_kptr.c
@@ -212,13 +212,13 @@
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 32),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 48),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.fixup_map_kptr = { 1 },
.result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "access beyond struct prog_test_ref_kfunc at off 32 size 8",
+ .errstr = "access beyond struct prog_test_ref_kfunc at off 48 size 8",
},
{
"map_kptr: unref: inherit PTR_UNTRUSTED on struct walk",
--
2.37.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists