lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YztC3BVzOiwOKZij@slm.duckdns.org> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 10:15:24 -1000 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] llist: Add a lock-less list variant terminated by a sentinel node Hello, On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 03:39:02PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > There are 123 instances where llist_head is referenced in arch, driver, > filesystem and kernel code. Going through all these to make sure that it > will all work will be a major effort. I think it will be safer to allow both > NULL and the sentinel node as the initializers and gradually convert them to > use the proper llist APIs over time to complete the conversion. I am sorry > that I can't spend that much time upfront for this conversion effort. I see. Oh well, thanks for taking a look. -- tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists