linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/83] 5.15.72-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d73eb14c-0acf-dfff-5dfb-1c0817485109@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 3 Oct 2022 16:12:14 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/83] 5.15.72-rc1 review

On 10/3/22 15:30, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/3/22 01:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.72 release.
>> There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Oct 2022 07:07:06 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.72-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>>
> 
> Compiled and booted on my test system. I am still seeing the drm related
> regression and didn't get a chance to isolate. Will try to do it this week.
> 
> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
> 

Sorry for the confusion. This 5.15.72 is just fine. The drm issue I am seeing
is on 5.10.147 and started in 5.10.146. I isolated it in 5.4 and testing the
same on 5.10 - will send responses to those threads.

Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.

Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>

thanks,
-- Shuah