linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] x86/asm: Force native_apic_mem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Oct 2022 16:07:22 -0700
From:   Adam Dunlap <acdunlap@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@...gle.com>,
        Alper Gun <alpergun@...gle.com>, Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>,
        "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] x86/asm: Force native_apic_mem_read to use mov

[resent with plain text]

Thanks for all the responses. Is the consensus that we should use the
readl function here or instead use inline assembly directly as in the patch
I originally sent out:

asm_inline("movl %1, %0" : "=r"(out) : "m"(*addr));

? The readl function has this exact same code, I'm just not sure
which version fits better stylistically.


On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 4:01 PM Adam Dunlap <acdunlap@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the responses. Is the consensus that we should use the
> readl function here or instead use inline assembly directly as in the patch
> I originally sent out:
>
> asm_inline("movl %1, %0" : "=r"(out) : "m"(*addr));
>
> ? The readl function has this exact same code, I'm just not sure
> which version fits better stylistically.