lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221003070726.844526673@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  3 Oct 2022 09:11:33 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.19 097/101] perf tests record: Fail the test if the errs counter is not zero

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 25c5e67cdf744cbb93fd06647611d3036218debe ]

We were just checking for the 'err' variable, when we should really see
if there was some of the many checked errors that don't stop the test
right away.

Detected with clang 15.0.0:

  44    75.23 fedora:37       : FAIL clang version 15.0.0 (Fedora 15.0.0-2.fc37)

    tests/perf-record.c:68:16: error: variable 'errs' set but not used [-Werror,-Wunused-but-set-variable]
            int err = -1, errs = 0, i, wakeups = 0;
                          ^
    1 error generated.

The patch introducing this 'perf test' entry had that check:

  +       return (err < 0 || errs > 0) ? -1 : 0;

But at some point we lost that:

  -	  return (err < 0 || errs > 0) ? -1 : 0;
  +	  if (err == -EACCES)
  +               return TEST_SKIP;
  +	  if (err < 0)
  +               return TEST_FAIL;
  +	  return TEST_OK

Put it back.

Fixes: 2cf88f4614c996e5 ("perf test: Use skip in PERF_RECORD_*")
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YzR0n5QhsH9VyYB0@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c b/tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c
index 6a001fcfed68..4952abe716f3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/perf-record.c
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static int test__PERF_RECORD(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest
 out:
 	if (err == -EACCES)
 		return TEST_SKIP;
-	if (err < 0)
+	if (err < 0 || errs != 0)
 		return TEST_FAIL;
 	return TEST_OK;
 }
-- 
2.35.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists