lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20221003070716.832118766@linuxfoundation.org> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 09:12:00 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> Subject: [PATCH 5.4 18/30] soc: sunxi: sram: Actually claim SRAM regions From: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org> [ Upstream commit fd362baad2e659ef0fb5652f023a606b248f1781 ] sunxi_sram_claim() checks the sram_desc->claimed flag before updating the register, with the intent that only one device can claim a region. However, this was ineffective because the flag was never set. Fixes: 4af34b572a85 ("drivers: soc: sunxi: Introduce SoC driver to map SRAMs") Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220815041248.53268-4-samuel@sholland.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> --- drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c b/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c index 1b0d50f36349..55f2d4dd42e8 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c +++ b/drivers/soc/sunxi/sunxi_sram.c @@ -254,6 +254,7 @@ int sunxi_sram_claim(struct device *dev) writel(val | ((device << sram_data->offset) & mask), base + sram_data->reg); + sram_desc->claimed = true; spin_unlock(&sram_lock); return 0; -- 2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists