[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YzpzVfwA7NMCIyIp@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 07:29:57 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@...cinc.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
Murali Nalajala <quic_mnalajal@...cinc.com>,
Trilok Soni <quic_tsoni@...cinc.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <quic_svaddagi@...cinc.com>,
Carl van Schaik <quic_cvanscha@...cinc.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: new checkpatch flexible array test ? (was Re: [PATCH v4 12/14]
gunyah: rsc_mgr: Add RPC for console services)
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 06:46:30PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-09-30 at 14:22 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 12:56:31PM -0700, Elliot Berman wrote:
> > > Gunyah resource manager defines a simple API for virtual machine log
> > > sharing with the console service.
> []
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h b/include/linux/gunyah_rsc_mgr.h
> []
> > > +struct gh_rm_notif_vm_console_chars {
> > > + u16 vmid;
> > > + u16 num_bytes;
> > > + u8 bytes[0];
> >
> > Please do not use [0] for new structures, otherwise we will just have to
> > fix them up again as we are trying to get rid of all of these from the
> > kernel. Just use "bytes[];" instead.
>
> Maybe a checkpatch addition like:
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 2737e4ced5745..187ed84c1f80a 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -3948,6 +3948,17 @@ sub process {
> }
> }
>
> +# check for zero length array declarations in likely structs
> + if ($line =~ /^\+\t($Declare\s*$Ident)\s*\[\s*0\s*\]\s*;\s*$/ &&
> + defined $lines[$linenr] &&
> + $lines[$linenr] =~ /^[\+ ]\}\s*(?:__\w+\s*(?:$balanced_parens)?)\s*;\s*$/) {
> + if (WARN("FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_ZERO",
> + "Prefer flexible length array declarations with [] over [0]\n" . $herecurr) &&
> + $fix) {
> + $fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\[\s*0\s*\]/[]/;
> + }
> + }
> +
> # check for multiple consecutive blank lines
> if ($prevline =~ /^[\+ ]\s*$/ &&
> $line =~ /^\+\s*$/ &&
This is a question for Gustavo, who did all the work here. Gustavo,
does the above checkpatch change look good to you?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists