[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878rlxxn9t.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:34:59 +0200
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: <Daniel.Machon@...rochip.com>
CC: <petrm@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<Lars.Povlsen@...rochip.com>, <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <joe@...ches.com>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, <Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com>,
<Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>, <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/6] net: microchip: sparx5: add support for
apptrust
<Daniel.Machon@...rochip.com> writes:
>> >> > Make use of set/getapptrust() to implement per-selector trust and trust
>> >> > order.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
>> >> > ---
>> >> > .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_dcb.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++
>> >> > .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_main.h | 3 +
>> >> > .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_port.c | 4 +-
>> >> > .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_port.h | 2 +
>> >> > .../ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_qos.c | 4 +
>> >> > 5 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_dcb.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_dcb.c
>> >> > index db17c124dac8..10aeb422b1ae 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_dcb.c
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/sparx5/sparx5_dcb.c
>> >> > @@ -8,6 +8,22 @@
>> >> >
>> >> > #include "sparx5_port.h"
>> >> >
>> >> > +static const struct sparx5_dcb_apptrust {
>> >> > + u8 selectors[256];
>> >> > + int nselectors;
>> >> > + char *names;
>> >>
>> >> I think this should be just "name".
>> >
>> > I dont think so. This is a str representation of all the selector values.
>> > "names" makes more sense to me.
>>
>> But it just points to one name, doesn't it? The name of this apptrust
>> policy...
>
> It points to a str of space-separated selector names. I inteded it to
> be a str repr. of the selector values, and not a str identifier of the
> apptrust policy.
Ah, that's what you mean. Sure, NP :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists