[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f865045-aa95-46b6-a455-c3d9c6d26494@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 10:37:26 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...nel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
leo.yan@...aro.org, quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] coresight: etm4x: Update ETM4 driver to use
Trace ID API
On 03/10/2022 10:31, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 09/08/2022 23:33, Mike Leach wrote:
>> The trace ID API is now used to allocate trace IDs for ETM4.x / ETE
>> devices.
>>
>> For perf sessions, these will be allocated on enable, and released on
>> disable.
>>
>> For sysfs sessions, these will be allocated on enable, but only released
>> on reset. This allows the sysfs session to interrogate the Trace ID used
>> after the session is over - maintaining functional consistency with the
>> previous allocation scheme.
>>
>> The trace ID will also be allocated on read of the mgmt/trctraceid file.
>> This ensures that if perf or sysfs read this before enabling trace, the
>> value will be the one used for the trace session.
>>
>> Trace ID initialisation is removed from the _probe() function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> .../coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++--
>> .../coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c | 27 ++++++-
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.h | 3 +
>> 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> index cf249ecad5a5..b4fb28ce89fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>> #include "coresight-etm4x-cfg.h"
>> #include "coresight-self-hosted-trace.h"
>> #include "coresight-syscfg.h"
>> +#include "coresight-trace-id.h"
>> static int boot_enable;
>> module_param(boot_enable, int, 0444);
>> @@ -234,6 +235,50 @@ static int etm4_trace_id(struct coresight_device
>> *csdev)
>> return drvdata->trcid;
>> }
>> +int etm4_read_alloc_trace_id(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +{
>> + int trace_id;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * This will allocate a trace ID to the cpu,
>> + * or return the one currently allocated.
>> + */
>> + /* trace id function has its own lock */
>> + trace_id = coresight_trace_id_get_cpu_id(drvdata->cpu);
>> + if (IS_VALID_ID(trace_id))
>> + drvdata->trcid = (u8)trace_id;
>> + else
>> + dev_err(&drvdata->csdev->dev,
>> + "Failed to allocate trace ID for %s on CPU%d\n",
>> + dev_name(&drvdata->csdev->dev), drvdata->cpu);
>> + return trace_id;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int etm4_set_current_trace_id(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +{
>> + int trace_id;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Set the currently allocated trace ID - perf allocates IDs
>> + * as part of setup_aux for all CPUs it may use.
>> + */
>> + trace_id = coresight_trace_id_read_cpu_id(drvdata->cpu);
>> + if (IS_VALID_ID(trace_id)) {
>> + drvdata->trcid = (u8)trace_id;
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_err(&drvdata->csdev->dev, "Failed to set trace ID for %s on
>> CPU%d\n",
>> + dev_name(&drvdata->csdev->dev), drvdata->cpu);
>> +
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>
>
>> +
>> +void etm4_release_trace_id(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
>> +{
>> + coresight_trace_id_put_cpu_id(drvdata->cpu);
>> +}
>> +
>> struct etm4_enable_arg {
>> struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata;
>> int rc;
>> @@ -729,6 +774,15 @@ static int etm4_enable_perf(struct
>> coresight_device *csdev,
>> ret = etm4_parse_event_config(csdev, event);
>> if (ret)
>> goto out;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * perf allocates cpu ids as part of setup - device needs to use
>> + * the allocated ID.
>> + */
>> + ret = etm4_set_current_trace_id(drvdata);
>
> So, when do we allocate an id in perf mode ? As far as I can see, this
> should be the same as etm4_read_alloc_trace_id() ? Why are they any
> different ?
>
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> /* And enable it */
>> ret = etm4_enable_hw(drvdata);
>> @@ -753,6 +807,11 @@ static int etm4_enable_sysfs(struct
>> coresight_device *csdev)
>> spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>> + /* sysfs needs to read and allocate a trace ID */
>> + ret = etm4_read_alloc_trace_id(drvdata);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + goto unlock_sysfs_enable;
>> +
>> /*
>> * Executing etm4_enable_hw on the cpu whose ETM is being enabled
>> * ensures that register writes occur when cpu is powered.
>> @@ -764,6 +823,11 @@ static int etm4_enable_sysfs(struct
>> coresight_device *csdev)
>> ret = arg.rc;
>> if (!ret)
>> drvdata->sticky_enable = true;
>> +
>> + if (ret)
>> + etm4_release_trace_id(drvdata);
>> +
>> +unlock_sysfs_enable:
>> spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
>> if (!ret)
>> @@ -895,6 +959,8 @@ static int etm4_disable_perf(struct
>> coresight_device *csdev,
>> /* TRCVICTLR::SSSTATUS, bit[9] */
>> filters->ssstatus = (control & BIT(9));
>> + /* The perf event will release trace ids when it is destroyed */
>> +
>
> At this patch level, there is no release of trace id ? Is that missed in
> this patch ? Or am I missing something ?
I think the above change only comes in PATCH 7. May be that patch needs
to be rearranged in order ? Otherwise git-bisect can break running a
perf session on cs_etm, with missing traceid.
Suzuki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists