[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cece2c1d-6e9b-d850-5321-31fae15cadb7@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 13:38:45 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hermes Wu <hermes.wu@....com.tw>,
Allen Chen <allen.chen@....com.tw>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/bridge: it6505: Adapt runtime power management
framework
Il 03/10/22 07:03, Pin-yen Lin ha scritto:
> Use pm_runtime_(get|put)_sync to control the bridge power, and add
> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS with pm_runtime_force_(suspend|resume) to it6505
> driver. Without SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS, the bridge will be powered on
> unnecessarily when no external display is connected.
>
> Fixes: b5c84a9edcd4 ("drm/bridge: add it6505 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Handle the error from pm_runtime_get_sync in it6505_extcon_work
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> index 2bb957cffd94..685d8e750b12 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c
> @@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ struct it6505 {
> struct notifier_block event_nb;
> struct extcon_dev *extcon;
> struct work_struct extcon_wq;
> + int extcon_state;
> enum drm_connector_status connector_status;
> enum link_train_status link_state;
> struct work_struct link_works;
> @@ -2685,31 +2686,42 @@ static void it6505_extcon_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct it6505 *it6505 = container_of(work, struct it6505, extcon_wq);
> struct device *dev = &it6505->client->dev;
> - int state = extcon_get_state(it6505->extcon, EXTCON_DISP_DP);
> - unsigned int pwroffretry = 0;
> + int state, ret;
>
> if (it6505->enable_drv_hold)
> return;
>
> mutex_lock(&it6505->extcon_lock);
>
> + state = extcon_get_state(it6505->extcon, EXTCON_DISP_DP);
> DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dev, "EXTCON_DISP_DP = 0x%02x", state);
> +
> + if (state == it6505->extcon_state)
> + goto unlock;
Even if it's unlikely for anything bad to happen, please add error handling,
or we might end up with unbalanced pm_runtime calls.
if (state == it6505->extcon_state || unlikely(state < 0))
goto unlock;
it6505->extcon_state = state;
if (state) {
....
} else {
....
}
Regards,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists