lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <cece2c1d-6e9b-d850-5321-31fae15cadb7@collabora.com> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 13:38:45 +0200 From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> To: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>, Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>, Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hermes Wu <hermes.wu@....com.tw>, Allen Chen <allen.chen@....com.tw>, Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/bridge: it6505: Adapt runtime power management framework Il 03/10/22 07:03, Pin-yen Lin ha scritto: > Use pm_runtime_(get|put)_sync to control the bridge power, and add > SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS with pm_runtime_force_(suspend|resume) to it6505 > driver. Without SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS, the bridge will be powered on > unnecessarily when no external display is connected. > > Fixes: b5c84a9edcd4 ("drm/bridge: add it6505 driver") > Signed-off-by: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > - Handle the error from pm_runtime_get_sync in it6505_extcon_work > > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c > index 2bb957cffd94..685d8e750b12 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ite-it6505.c > @@ -421,6 +421,7 @@ struct it6505 { > struct notifier_block event_nb; > struct extcon_dev *extcon; > struct work_struct extcon_wq; > + int extcon_state; > enum drm_connector_status connector_status; > enum link_train_status link_state; > struct work_struct link_works; > @@ -2685,31 +2686,42 @@ static void it6505_extcon_work(struct work_struct *work) > { > struct it6505 *it6505 = container_of(work, struct it6505, extcon_wq); > struct device *dev = &it6505->client->dev; > - int state = extcon_get_state(it6505->extcon, EXTCON_DISP_DP); > - unsigned int pwroffretry = 0; > + int state, ret; > > if (it6505->enable_drv_hold) > return; > > mutex_lock(&it6505->extcon_lock); > > + state = extcon_get_state(it6505->extcon, EXTCON_DISP_DP); > DRM_DEV_DEBUG_DRIVER(dev, "EXTCON_DISP_DP = 0x%02x", state); > + > + if (state == it6505->extcon_state) > + goto unlock; Even if it's unlikely for anything bad to happen, please add error handling, or we might end up with unbalanced pm_runtime calls. if (state == it6505->extcon_state || unlikely(state < 0)) goto unlock; it6505->extcon_state = state; if (state) { .... } else { .... } Regards, Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists