linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] x86/cpufeatures: Add Slow Memory Bandwidth Allocation feature flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f42ac1ce-c23d-49de-0b32-d82cd5f49e1f@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Oct 2022 08:24:12 -0700
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     <babu.moger@....com>, <corbet@....net>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        <mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        <x86@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>, <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        <rdunlap@...radead.org>, <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        <songmuchun@...edance.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>, <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        <jmattson@...gle.com>, <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
        <sandipan.das@....com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        <james.morse@....com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/12] x86/cpufeatures: Add Slow Memory Bandwidth
 Allocation feature flag

Hi Babu,

On 10/3/2022 7:45 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> On 9/29/22 16:58, Reinette Chatre wrote:

>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Flkml%2Fc4a9ea23-4280-d54c-263b-354ea321f746%40intel.com%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cbabu.moger%40amd.com%7Cdf869c35332b477dc5e808daa265c0cd%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C638000855157338562%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=4tuK0pMrJsiW44IKCkeZV8ujS4z9STOa3mKfRKbHulk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>
>> Also missing is highlighting that configuration has changed from
>> per-domain to per-CPU and why.
> 
> Already responded about this in patch 10.
> 

It is not clear to me which response you are referring to. Could you please
provide a link?

Reinette