[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221003153420.285896-1-vschneid@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 16:34:15 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
To: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bitmap-for-next 0/5] bitmap,cpumask: Add for_each_cpu_andnot()
As suggested by Yury, this is the bitmap/cpumask specific bits of [1]. This now
also contains an extra fix for blk_mq.
This is based on top of Yury's bitmap-for-next [2].
A note on treewide use of for_each_cpu_andnot()
===============================================
I've used the below coccinelle script to find places that could be patched (I
couldn't figure out the valid syntax to patch from coccinelle itself):
,-----
@tmpandnot@
expression tmpmask;
iterator for_each_cpu;
position p;
statement S;
@@
cpumask_andnot(tmpmask, ...);
...
(
for_each_cpu@p(..., tmpmask, ...)
S
|
for_each_cpu@p(..., tmpmask, ...)
{
...
}
)
@script:python depends on tmpandnot@
p << tmpandnot.p;
@@
coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], "andnot loop here")
'-----
Which yields (against c40e8341e3b3):
.//arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:1587:1-13: andnot loop here
.//arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:1530:1-13: andnot loop here
.//arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:1440:1-13: andnot loop here
.//arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/subcore.c:306:2-14: andnot loop here
.//arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c:62:1-13: andnot loop here
.//drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c:110:1-13: andnot loop here
.//drivers/cpufreq/armada-8k-cpufreq.c:148:1-13: andnot loop here
.//drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:931:1-13: andnot loop here
.//drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c:73:1-13: andnot loop here
.//drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena/efx_channels.c:73:1-13: andnot loop here
.//kernel/sched/core.c:345:1-13: andnot loop here
.//kernel/sched/core.c:366:1-13: andnot loop here
.//net/core/dev.c:3058:1-13: andnot loop here
A lot of those are actually of the shape
for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
...
cpumask_andnot(mask, ...);
}
I think *some* of the powerpc ones would be a match for for_each_cpu_andnot(),
but I decided to just stick to the one obvious one in __sched_core_flip().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220923132527.1001870-1-vschneid@redhat.com/
[2]: https://github.com/norov/linux.git/ -b bitmap-for-next
Cheers,
Valentin
Valentin Schneider (5):
blk_mq: Fix cpumask_check() warning in blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu()
lib/find_bit: Introduce find_next_andnot_bit()
cpumask: Introduce for_each_cpu_andnot()
lib/test_cpumask: Add for_each_cpu_and(not) tests
sched/core: Merge cpumask_andnot()+for_each_cpu() into
for_each_cpu_andnot()
block/blk-mq.c | 9 +++++++--
include/linux/cpumask.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/find.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +----
lib/cpumask_kunit.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
lib/find_bit.c | 9 +++++++++
6 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists