linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 10/39] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221003162613.2yvhvb6hmnae2awz@box.shutemov.name>
Date:   Mon, 3 Oct 2022 19:26:13 +0300
From:   "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        "H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "Ravi V . Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
        joao.moreira@...el.com, John Allen <john.allen@....com>,
        kcc@...gle.com, eranian@...gle.com, rppt@...nel.org,
        jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com, dethoma@...rosoft.com,
        Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/39] x86/mm: Introduce _PAGE_COW

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 03:29:07PM -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> +/*
> + * Normally the Dirty bit is used to denote COW memory on x86. But
> + * in the case of X86_FEATURE_SHSTK, the software COW bit is used,
> + * since the Dirty=1,Write=0 will result in the memory being treated
> + * as shaodw stack by the HW. So when creating COW memory, a software
> + * bit is used _PAGE_BIT_COW. The following functions pte_mkcow() and
> + * pte_clear_cow() take a PTE marked conventially COW (Dirty=1) and
> + * transition it to the shadow stack compatible version of COW (Cow=1).
> + */
> +
> +static inline pte_t pte_mkcow(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
> +		return pte;
> +
> +	pte = pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_DIRTY);
> +	return pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_COW);
> +}
> +
> +static inline pte_t pte_clear_cow(pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * _PAGE_COW is unnecessary on !X86_FEATURE_SHSTK kernels.
> +	 * See the _PAGE_COW definition for more details.
> +	 */
> +	if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK))
> +		return pte;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * PTE is getting copied-on-write, so it will be dirtied
> +	 * if writable, or made shadow stack if shadow stack and
> +	 * being copied on access. Set they dirty bit for both
> +	 * cases.
> +	 */
> +	pte = pte_set_flags(pte, _PAGE_DIRTY);
> +	return pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_COW);
> +}

These X86_FEATURE_SHSTK checks make me uneasy. Maybe use the _PAGE_COW
logic for all machines with 64-bit entries. It will get you much more
coverage and more universal rules.

> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_WP
>  static inline int pte_uffd_wp(pte_t pte)
>  {
> @@ -319,7 +381,7 @@ static inline pte_t pte_clear_uffd_wp(pte_t pte)
>  
>  static inline pte_t pte_mkclean(pte_t pte)
>  {
> -	return pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_DIRTY);
> +	return pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_DIRTY_BITS);
>  }
>  
>  static inline pte_t pte_mkold(pte_t pte)
> @@ -329,7 +391,16 @@ static inline pte_t pte_mkold(pte_t pte)
>  
>  static inline pte_t pte_wrprotect(pte_t pte)
>  {
> -	return pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_RW);
> +	pte = pte_clear_flags(pte, _PAGE_RW);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Blindly clearing _PAGE_RW might accidentally create
> +	 * a shadow stack PTE (Write=0,Dirty=1). Move the hardware
> +	 * dirty value to the software bit.
> +	 */
> +	if (pte_dirty(pte))
> +		pte = pte_mkcow(pte);
> +	return pte;
>  }

Hm. What about ptep/pmdp_set_wrprotect()? They clear _PAGE_RW blindly.

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov