[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E5D7151E-B5A6-4BEA-9642-ECCFC28F8C8E@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 11:11:33 -0700
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V . Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
joao.moreira@...el.com, John Allen <john.allen@....com>,
kcc@...gle.com, eranian@...gle.com,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com,
dethoma@...rosoft.com, Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/39] x86/mm: Update ptep_set_wrprotect() and
pmdp_set_wrprotect() for transition from _PAGE_DIRTY to _PAGE_COW
On Sep 29, 2022, at 3:29 PM, Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com> wrote:
> From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
>
> When Shadow Stack is in use, Write=0,Dirty=1 PTE are reserved for shadow
> stack. Copy-on-write PTes then have Write=0,Cow=1.
>
> When a PTE goes from Write=1,Dirty=1 to Write=0,Cow=1, it could
> become a transient shadow stack PTE in two cases:
>
> The first case is that some processors can start a write but end up seeing
> a Write=0 PTE by the time they get to the Dirty bit, creating a transient
> shadow stack PTE. However, this will not occur on processors supporting
> Shadow Stack, and a TLB flush is not necessary.
>
> The second case is that when _PAGE_DIRTY is replaced with _PAGE_COW non-
> atomically, a transient shadow stack PTE can be created as a result.
> Thus, prevent that with cmpxchg.
>
> Dave Hansen, Jann Horn, Andy Lutomirski, and Peter Zijlstra provided many
> insights to the issue. Jann Horn provided the cmpxchg solution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
> Co-developed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
>
> ---
>
> v2:
> - Compile out some code due to clang build error
> - Clarify commit log (dhansen)
> - Normalize PTE bit descriptions between patches (dhansen)
> - Update comment with text from (dhansen)
>
> Yu-cheng v30:
> - Replace (pmdval_t) cast with CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELES > 2 (Borislav Petkov).
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 2f2963429f48..58c7bf9d7392 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -1287,6 +1287,23 @@ static inline pte_t ptep_get_and_clear_full(struct mm_struct *mm,
> static inline void ptep_set_wrprotect(struct mm_struct *mm,
> unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_SHADOW_STACK
> + /*
> + * Avoid accidentally creating shadow stack PTEs
> + * (Write=0,Dirty=1). Use cmpxchg() to prevent races with
> + * the hardware setting Dirty=1.
> + */
> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) {
> + pte_t old_pte, new_pte;
> +
> + old_pte = READ_ONCE(*ptep);
> + do {
> + new_pte = pte_wrprotect(old_pte);
> + } while (!try_cmpxchg(&ptep->pte, &old_pte.pte, new_pte.pte));
> +
> + return;
> + }
> +#endif
There is no way of using IS_ENABLED() here instead of these ifdefs?
Did you have a look at ptep_set_access_flags() and friends and checked they
do not need to be changed too? Perhaps you should at least add some
assertion just to ensure nothing breaks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists