[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN6PR12MB2767CD108EBA7BE5D027330D8E5B9@SN6PR12MB2767.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 18:43:08 +0000
From: "Kalra, Ashish" <Ashish.Kalra@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"jroedel@...e.de" <jroedel@...e.de>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"jmattson@...gle.com" <jmattson@...gle.com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"slp@...hat.com" <slp@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com"
<srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com" <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>,
"tobin@....com" <tobin@....com>,
"Roth, Michael" <Michael.Roth@....com>,
"vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"kirill@...temov.name" <kirill@...temov.name>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"marcorr@...gle.com" <marcorr@...gle.com>,
"sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
"alpergun@...gle.com" <alpergun@...gle.com>,
"dgilbert@...hat.com" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
"jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH Part2 v6 13/49] crypto:ccp: Provide APIs to issue SEV-SNP
commands
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
>> We already have sev_issue_cmd_external_user() exported right?
>>
>> Another option could be to make these wrappers more helpful and less
>> silly.
>For example.
>My point is, whenever something needs to issue a SEV* fw command, something adds a silly wrapper and this will become unwieldy pretty quickly.
>If a wrapper is not a dumb one but it actually does preparatory work before issuing the command so that the caller's life is made easy, then yes, by all means.
>If it is only plain forwarding a call to sev_do_cmd(), then I question the whole point of the exercise...
Well, these all were added as APIs to serve as a abstraction for SEV/SNP guest, and probably it is nice to have an abstracted interface, but I have no issues
with replacing these simply with calls to sev_do_cmd().
Thanks,
Ashish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists