[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221004174018.3319712-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:40:18 +0200
From: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: virtio: Fix warning on bindings by removing the of_match_table
The checkpatch tool complains that "virtio,rproc" is not documented.
But it is not possible to probe the device "rproc-virtio" by declaring
it in the device tree. So documenting it in the bindings does not make
sense.
This commit solves the checkpatch warning by suppressing the useless
of_match_table.
Fix-suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Fixes: 1d7b61c06dc3 ("remoteproc: virtio: Create platform device for the remoteproc_virtio")
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
index a29e3b8ff69c..26a7d8c498bc 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_virtio.c
@@ -593,17 +593,11 @@ static int rproc_virtio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
/* Platform driver */
-static const struct of_device_id rproc_virtio_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "virtio,rproc" },
- {},
-};
-
static struct platform_driver rproc_virtio_driver = {
.probe = rproc_virtio_probe,
.remove = rproc_virtio_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "rproc-virtio",
- .of_match_table = rproc_virtio_match,
},
};
builtin_platform_driver(rproc_virtio_driver);
--
2.24.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists