[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221004104253.29c1f3c7@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:42:53 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+3a080099974c271cd7e9@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
fw@...len.de, harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] upstream boot error: WARNING in netlink_ack
On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 07:36:55 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> This is fixed in the pending netdev tree coming for the merge window.
This has been weighing on my conscience a little, I don't like how we
still depend on putting one length in the skb and then using a
different one for the actual memcpy(). How would you feel about this
patch on top (untested):
diff --git a/include/net/netlink.h b/include/net/netlink.h
index 4418b1981e31..6ad671441dff 100644
--- a/include/net/netlink.h
+++ b/include/net/netlink.h
@@ -931,6 +931,29 @@ static inline struct nlmsghdr *nlmsg_put(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 portid, u32 se
return __nlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, type, payload, flags);
}
+/**
+ * nlmsg_append - Add more data to a nlmsg in a skb
+ * @skb: socket buffer to store message in
+ * @nlh: message header
+ * @payload: length of message payload
+ *
+ * Append data to an existing nlmsg, used when constructing a message
+ * with multiple fixed-format headers (which is rare).
+ * Returns NULL if the tailroom of the skb is insufficient to store
+ * the extra payload.
+ */
+static inline void *nlmsg_append(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
+ u32 size)
+{
+ if (unlikely(skb_tailroom(skb) < NLMSG_ALIGN(size)))
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (!__builtin_constant_p(size) || NLMSG_ALIGN(size) - size != 0)
+ memset(skb_tail_pointer(skb) + size, 0,
+ NLMSG_ALIGN(size) - size);
+ return __skb_put(NLMSG_ALIGN(size));
+}
+
/**
* nlmsg_put_answer - Add a new callback based netlink message to an skb
* @skb: socket buffer to store message in
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index a662e8a5ff84..bb3d855d1f57 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -2488,19 +2488,28 @@ void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err,
flags |= NLM_F_ACK_TLVS;
skb = nlmsg_new(payload + tlvlen, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!skb) {
- NETLINK_CB(in_skb).sk->sk_err = ENOBUFS;
- sk_error_report(NETLINK_CB(in_skb).sk);
- return;
- }
+ if (!skb)
+ goto err_bad_put;
rep = nlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid, nlh->nlmsg_seq,
- NLMSG_ERROR, payload, flags);
+ NLMSG_ERROR, sizeof(*errmsg), flags);
+ if (!rep)
+ goto err_bad_put;
errmsg = nlmsg_data(rep);
errmsg->error = err;
- unsafe_memcpy(&errmsg->msg, nlh, payload > sizeof(*errmsg)
- ? nlh->nlmsg_len : sizeof(*nlh),
- /* Bounds checked by the skb layer. */);
+ memcpy(&errmsg->msg, nlh, sizeof(*nlh));
+
+ if (!(flags & NLM_F_CAPPED)) {
+ size_t data_len = nlh->nlmsg_len - sizeof(*nlh);
+ void *data;
+
+ data = nlmsg_append(skb, rep, data_len);
+ if (!data)
+ goto err_bad_put;
+
+ /* the nlh + 1 is probably going to make you unhappy? */
+ memcpy(data, nlh + 1, data_len);
+ }
if (tlvlen)
netlink_ack_tlv_fill(in_skb, skb, nlh, err, extack);
@@ -2508,6 +2517,12 @@ void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err,
nlmsg_end(skb, rep);
nlmsg_unicast(in_skb->sk, skb, NETLINK_CB(in_skb).portid);
+
+ return;
+
+err_bad_put:
+ NETLINK_CB(in_skb).sk->sk_err = ENOBUFS;
+ sk_error_report(NETLINK_CB(in_skb).sk);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(netlink_ack);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists