linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/83] 5.15.72-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YzxxVJqph3iOHcdb@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:45:56 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/83] 5.15.72-rc1 review

On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 07:26:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/3/22 00:10, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.72 release.
> > There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Oct 2022 07:07:06 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> perf fails to build.
> 
> In file included from util/evlist.h:13,
>                  from builtin-annotate.c:21:
> util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
>   266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
>       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                      PERF_TXN_MAX
> In file included from util/hist.h:8,
>                  from builtin-diff.c:13:
> util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
>   266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
>       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                      PERF_TXN_MAX
> In file included from util/evlist.h:13,
>                  from builtin-evlist.c:11:
> util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
>   266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
>       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                      PERF_TXN_MAX
> In file included from tools/perf/util/evlist.h:13,
>                  from builtin-ftrace.c:24:
> tools/perf/util/evsel.h:266:38: error: ‘PERF_TOOL_MAX’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean ‘PERF_TXN_MAX’?
>   266 | extern const char *evsel__tool_names[PERF_TOOL_MAX];
>       |                                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                      PERF_TXN_MAX
> builtin-annotate.c: In function ‘cmd_annotate’:
> builtin-annotate.c:594:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘symbol__validate_sym_arguments’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   594 |  ret = symbol__validate_sym_arguments();
>       |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks, I've dropped all perf patches from the 5.15 queue right now as
they seem to have been added incorrectly.

That being said, I can't build perf for 5.15.y now anyway, so something
older must have broken my system, glad it's building for you...

thanks

greg k-h