lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjBRtxcTQ0UXUWKFYWbz-vc8wCFZYV7UuJegH4nQot_UA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 10:55:51 -0700 From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] bitmap changes for v6.0-rc1 On Sun, Oct 2, 2022 at 7:03 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote: > > Please pull this patches. They spent more than a week in -next without > major problems. The only problem with warnings generated by cpumask_check(), > when robots do bisection, is fixed by moving the patch "cpumask: fix > checking valid cpu range" to the very end of the series. So I appreciate the commentary about process just to explain what's going on. But what I want for the merge message is a summary of what the pull actually *does* - the process commentary is good addition, but it's not useful for the merge commit message about what the merge actually brings in. And for that, I do *not* want explanations like this: > This branch is based on v6.0-rc4 and includes: > > drivers/base: Fix unsigned comparison to -1 in CPUMAP_FILE_MAX_BYTES > From Phil Auld > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220906203542.1796629-1-pauld@redhat.com/ ... where the explanations just point to external data. Commit messages are supposed to be self-sufficient. External links can be acceptable as a "this has subtle issues that are too boring and extensive to explain here", but even then it's only for _additional_ commentary, not a replacement for explaining what is going on. And those external links aren't even that. They are literally just the "this is where the patches were posted originally". Not useful. So I'm dropping this as not having enough explanations of why I should pull them. It has explanations, yes, but they are about secondary things, not about the actual expected improvements brought in by the pull. Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists