[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221004133611.0f4de477@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 13:36:11 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: <Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com>
Cc: <andrew@...n.ch>, <hkallweit1@...il.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: Fixes FIELD_GET assertion
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 06:28:44 +0000 Divya.Koppera@...rochip.com wrote:
> > Does not apply cleanly to net, please rebase & resend.
>
> I generated patch on net-next, as it is fix I kept for net. When I
> tried to apply these changes on net, this is getting failed as this
> main patch(21b688dabecb6a) did not go in net. Shall I resend patch
> for net-next?
Maybe wait a day or two and rebase + resend in two day or so, we're
waiting to Linus to pull net-next after which point the trees will get
forwarded to the same point.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists